Which of the following statements is true about nonmetallic objects in lightning strikes?

Nonmetallic objects can indeed be struck by lightning, and they are not entirely safe just because they lack metallic properties. The notion that they are equally likely to be struck as metallic objects stems from the fact that lightning can strike a wide variety of objects, regardless of their material composition. While metallic objects are more conductive and often considered more likely to attract lightning, other factors such as height, location, and moisture can influence vulnerability to a strike.

For instance, a tall tree or a nonmetallic object that is in close proximity to a lightning strike path can similarly be affected by a lightning bolt. The electrical charge needs a path to ground, and if a nonmetallic structure provides the right conditions—such as being the tallest point in an area—it can still be impacted by a lightning strike.

This understanding underscores the unpredictability of lightning and emphasizes the importance of safety measures regardless of the materials present. The focus on height and environmental conditions rather than material alone is key in considering the likelihood of lightning strikes.